The project will focus on a particularly difficult area of shared decision-making by looking at doctor-patient interactions for patients who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Deciding on prostate cancer treatment is troubling and controversial, because data does not consistently show any treatment that improves overall survival, and there are large differences in side effects. The project will analyze audio recordings of doctor visits and patient surveys collected in a previous study to 1) better understand how doctors and patients decide on treatment when patients are well-informed and 2) to evaluate the impact of the amount of shared decision-making in the doctor visit on patients’ decisions.
- RT @CBSSM: TODAY Join @CBSSM for "Concussion" Film Screening & Discussion (Mar 30, 7 pm, Forum Hall) @UM_SPH goo.gl/AIGSCp 3 hours ago
- CHM Flint endowed professor of public health to cap off Spring Brownbag Series - ow.ly/ioeE30apDX8 #bioethics https://t.co/dFyVIlhn6K 4 hours ago
- Opinion: Don’t Discriminate Against Mutants Like Me - ow.ly/zTEQ30aiSro via @nytimes 5 hours ago
- This event features Assistant Professor Dr. Karen Kelly-Blake as one of the panelists: twitter.com/CBSSM/status/8… 1 day ago
- When Hospital Inspectors Are Watching, Fewer Patients Die - ow.ly/j29h30aiS4F via @nytimes 1 day ago
Top Posts & Pages
- Humor in Medicine: Nasty, Dark, and Shades of Grey
- Overdosing on Prescription Painkillers: Dying for Pain Relief?
- CHM Flint endowed professor of public health to cap off Spring Brownbag Series
- Transplant and Trafficking in Nepal: The Ethical Concerns
- No More Death Panels; Politically-Assisted Suicide Instead