The project will focus on a particularly difficult area of shared decision-making by looking at doctor-patient interactions for patients who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Deciding on prostate cancer treatment is troubling and controversial, because data does not consistently show any treatment that improves overall survival, and there are large differences in side effects. The project will analyze audio recordings of doctor visits and patient surveys collected in a previous study to 1) better understand how doctors and patients decide on treatment when patients are well-informed and 2) to evaluate the impact of the amount of shared decision-making in the doctor visit on patients’ decisions.
- Our free archive of recorded #bioethics webinars contains lectures on a wide variety of topics from expert speakers: bioethics.msu.edu/brownbag-webin… 1 hour ago
- Clinical and Legal Perspectives on Brain Death: Stahl and Tomlinson - Episode 11 bioethics.msu.edu/podcasts/95-po…… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 hours ago
- Informed Consent in Africa for Adolescents’ Participation in Health Research msubioethics.com/2018/06/14/inf… #BioethicsInTheNews 3 hours ago
- The Center for Ethics faculty continually work to establish and maintain international partnerships to collaborate… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 hours ago
- From @Slate: Six-week abortion bans are just the beginning. The abortion abolition movement is on the rise. ow.ly/ec3S30ovHpE 7 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages
- Humor in Medicine: Nasty, Dark, and Shades of Grey
- Ketamine for Depression: Research versus Marketing
- Three Cheers for the DNR Tattoo
- Recognizing Menstrual Supplies as Basic Health Necessities: The Bioethics of #FreePeriods
- Bioethics for Breakfast: ACOs: Are They New or Just HMOs in Sheep's Clothing?