The project will focus on a particularly difficult area of shared decision-making by looking at doctor-patient interactions for patients who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer. Deciding on prostate cancer treatment is troubling and controversial, because data does not consistently show any treatment that improves overall survival, and there are large differences in side effects. The project will analyze audio recordings of doctor visits and patient surveys collected in a previous study to 1) better understand how doctors and patients decide on treatment when patients are well-informed and 2) to evaluate the impact of the amount of shared decision-making in the doctor visit on patients’ decisions.
- Would you like to receive Center for Ethics event, blog, and podcast announcements in your inbox? Join our mailing… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 2 hours ago
- Are Researchers Ever Obligated to Provide Individual Research Findings to Non-participant Third Parties?… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 3 hours ago
- China Is Quietly Collecting DNA Samples From Millions Of People - ow.ly/e2gK30hcBAp via @BuzzFeedNews 4 hours ago
- What sort of justification must be given for regulating or banning gene-editing technologies used to create or modi… twitter.com/i/web/status/9… 5 hours ago
- Our free archive of recorded #bioethics webinars contains lectures on a wide variety of topics from expert speakers: bioethics.msu.edu/brownbag-webin… 6 hours ago
Top Posts & Pages