This post is a part of our Bioethics in the News series
By Devan Stahl, PhD
Over the past two months, we have witnessed two more mass shootings in Las Vegas and Sutherland Springs, TX. Once again, these incidents bring up the debates surrounding gun legislation and access to mental health care. In reference to the Texas shooting, President Trump commented, “This is a mental health problem at the highest level. It’s a very, very sad event.” Soon after, it was revealed that Devin Kelley, the Texas shooter, had briefly escaped from a mental hospital in 2012 after he made death threats against his superiors in the Air Force. Both the president and the media emphasized the connection between mental illness and mass shootings. In fact, Johns Hopkins University found that over one-third of all news stories about mental illness were connected to violence. Psychiatric journals are also more likely to publish articles connecting mental illness with aggression than mental illness and victimhood, even though persons with mental illness are ten times more likely to be victims of violent crimes, including police shootings. It is no wonder that 63% of Americans blame mass shootings on the failure of the mental health system.
When confronted with a mass shooting, it is hard not to assume that mass shooters are mentally ill. After all, what sane person could commit such a horrible act? The media and even psychiatric professionals are quick to look for associations between mental illness and mass shootings. After Adam Lanza took the lives of twenty children and six adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School, new research on the brains of mass shooters began. More recently, the brain of Stephen Paddock, who killed 59 people in Las Vegas, was shipped to the Las Vegas coroner’s office for a neuropathological examination to look for any “mental aberrance” to explain his behavior, even though neuropathologists admit correlating brain structures with behavior is “cloudy business.”
Research shows us, however, that the link between gun violence and mental illness is far more complicated than it would appear. In general, it is hard to generalize about mass shooters because they are relatively rare. Although there is some evidence to show persons with severe or untreated mental illness might be at increased risk for violence when experiencing psychotic episodes or between psychiatric hospitalizations, many of these studies have been heavily critiqued for overstating connections between serious mental illness and violence. On aggregate, there is not a strong connection between mental illness and gun violence.
Close to 18% (43.4 million) of adults in the U.S. have some form of mental illness, which is on par with other countries, yet Americans are ten times more likely to die from guns than other citizens in high-income countries. The American Psychiatric Association found that around 4% of violent crimes perpetrated in America are attributable to mental illness and only 1% of discharged psychiatric patients commit violence against strangers using a gun. Persons with mental illness are less likely than those without a mental illness to use a gun to commit a crime. The vast majority of people with severe mental illness, including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and severe depression are no more likely than any other person to be violent. There is simply no clear causal link between mental illness and gun violence.
On the other hand, research shows that there are much stronger predictors of individual gun violence than mental illness, including: alcohol and drug abuse, domestic violence, past or pending violent misdemeanor convictions or charges, and history of childhood abuse.
There are a number of problems with associating mass shootings with mental illness. First, it stigmatizes millions of people living with mental health conditions. Research shows that negative attitudes surrounding mental illness prevent people from seeking treatment. Linking mental illness with violence threatens to restrict the rights and freedoms we afford ordinary citizens. Second, the burden of identifying would-be shooters has now fallen on psychiatrists who are not necessarily equipped to identify violent gun criminals. A number of states now mandate psychiatrists assess their patients for their potential to commit a violent gun crime, but psychiatrists are not great predictors of gun violence, and some research shows they are no more able to predict gun violence than laypersons. Psychiatrists who fail to identify mass shooters may now be held liable for crimes they fail to predict. Third, linking gun violence to mental health therapies may not help to reduce gun violence. Few of the persons who are most at risk for committing a violent gun crime have been involuntarily hospitalized, and therefore would not be subject to existing legal restrictions on firearms. Finally, the focus on mental health obscures other reasons for our nation’s gun violence problem. By focusing almost exclusively on mental health, we fail to identify the myriad of other factors, including historical, cultural, legal, and economic conditions that contribute to gun violence in our country.
It is easy to blame mass shootings on the “abnormal brain”–it is far more difficult to uncover or come to terms with the systemic causes of gun violence that wreak havoc on our communities. There are good reasons to ensure all Americans have access to mental health services, but access to such care is unlikely to stem the tide of mass shootings in our country. Mental illness has become a convenient scapegoat for politicians on both sides of the aisle when it comes to mass shootings, but it is time we begin to look more closely at other culprits.
Devan Stahl, PhD, is an Assistant Professor in the Center for Ethics and Humanities in the Life Sciences and the Department of Pediatrics and Human Development in the Michigan State University College of Human Medicine.
Join the discussion! Your comments and responses to this commentary are welcomed. The author will respond to all comments made by Thursday, November 30, 2017. With your participation, we hope to create discussions rich with insights from diverse perspectives.
You must provide your name and email address to leave a comment. Your email address will not be made public.
More Bioethics in the News from Dr. Stahl: Disability and the Decisional Capacity to Vote
- Diamond, J. “Trump says Texas Shooting Result of ‘Mental Health Problem’ Not US Gun Laws,” CNN Politics. November 6, 2017. http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/05/politics/trump-texas-shooting-act-evil/index.html. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Associated Press. “Latest: Gunman Previously Committed to Mental Health Center,” Business Insider. November 7, 2017. http://www.businessinsider.com/ap-latest-gunman-previously-committed-to-mental-health-center-2017-11. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- “Washington Post-ABC News poll, Oct. 15-18, 2015.” The Washington Post, http://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/page/politics/washington-post-abc-news-poll-oct-15-18-2015/1852/. 2015. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Associated Press, “Newton Parents Back Study for Clues to Violence in the Brain,” Fox News. April 15, 2013. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/04/15/newtown-parents-back-study-for-clues-to-violence-in-brain.html. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Frankel, J. “Las Vegas Shooting: Will Slicing Open Stephen Paddock’s Brain Explain Why He Gunned Down 59 People?” Newsweek. November 2, 2017. http://www.newsweek.com/why-are-researchers-examining-las-vegas-shooters-brain-697809. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- McGinty, E. E., Kennedy-Hendricks, A., Chosky, S. et al. 2014. “Trends in News Media Coverage of Mental Illness in the United States: 1995-2014. Health Affairs 35 (6): 1121-1129.
- Kaplan T, Hakim D. “New York Has Gun Deal, With Focus on Mental Ills.” New York Times. January 14, 2013: NY/Region. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/15/nyregion/new-york-legislators-hope-for-speedy-vote-on-gun-laws.html. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Department of Health and Human Services. 2014. “Mental Health Myths and Facts.” HHS.gov. https://www.mentalhealth.gov/basics/myths-facts/index.html. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- “Deadly force. Police and the mentally ill. Portland Press Herald.” http://www.pressherald.com/special/Maine_police_deadly_force_series_Day_1.html. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Gold, L.H, and Simon, R.I. 2016. Gun Violence and Mental Illness. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association.
- Choe, J.Y., Teplin, L.A., Abram, K.M. 2008. “Perpetrating of Violence, Violent Victimization, and Severe Mental Illness: Balancing Public Health Concerns.” Psychiatric Services. 59(2): 153-64.
- Grohol, J.M. “Violence and Mental Illness: Simplifying Complex Data Relationships.” World of Psychology. https://psychcentral.com/blog/archives/2007/05/02/violence-and-mental-illness-simplifying-complex-data-relationships/. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- National Institute of Mental Health. “Any Mental Illness Among U.S. Adults,” https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/prevalence/any-mental-illness-ami-among-us-adults.shtml. Accessed 10- November 2017.
- National Alliance on Mental Illness, “Mental Health Facts in America.” https://www.nami.org/NAMI/media/NAMI-Media/Infographics/GeneralMHFacts.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Grinshteyn, E., Hemenway, D. “Violent Death Rates: US Compared with Other High-income OECD Countries, 2010,” American Journal of Medicine. 129(3): 266-273.
- Fazel, S., Grann, M. 2006. “The Population Impact of Sever Mental Illness on Violent Crime,” The American Journal of Psychiatry 163(8): 1397-1403.
- Steadman, H.J., Monahan, J. Pinals, D.A. et al. “2015. “Gun Violence and Victimization of Strangers by Persons with a Mental Illness: Data from the MacArthur Violence Risk Assessment Study,” Psychiatric Services 66(11): 1238-41.
- Appealbaum, P.S. 2006. “Violence and Mental Disorders: Data and Public Policy,” American Journal of Psychiatry 163(8): 1319-21.
- Van Dorn, R., Volavka, J., Johnson, N. 2012. “Mental Disorder and Violence: Is there a Relationship Beyond Substance Abuse?” Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemology 47(3): 487-503.
- Swanson, J.W., Sampson, N.A., Petukhova, M.V. et al. 2015. “Guns, Impulsive Angry Behavior, and Mental Disorders: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication,” Behavioral Science and the Law 33(2-3): 199-212.
- “Stigma as a Barrier to Mental Health Care,” Association for Psychological Science. http://www.psychologicalscience.org/news/releases/stigma-as-a-barrier-to-mental-health-care.html. Accessed 10 November 2017.
- Richman, J. “A list of California Gun Bills Signed or Vetoed by Gov. Jerry Brown,” The Mercury News, October 11, 2013. http://www.mercurynews.com/2013/10/11/a-list-of-california-gun-bills-signed-or-vetoed-by-gov-jerry-brown/. Accessed 10 November, 2017.
- Swanson, J.W. 2011. Explaining Rare Acts of Violence: The Limits of Evidence from Population Research,” Psychiatric Services 62(11):1369-71.
- Metzl, J.M., MacLeish, K.T. 2015. “Mental Illness, Mass Shootings, and the Politics of American Firearms,” American Journal of Public Health 105(2): 240-49.
- Khazan, O. “Why Better Mental-Health Care Won’t Stop Mass Shootings,” The Atlantic, October 4, 2017. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2017/10/why-better-mental-health-care-wont-stop-mass-shootings/541965/. Accessed 10 November 2017.